+ 9 - 9 | § ¶Stanford professor proposes electoral college work-around
An interesting proposal by a Stanford comp sci (not polisci) professor:A Stanford University computer science professor has come up with an idea to circumvent the more than 200-year-old Electoral College system and institute a national popular vote to elect the president of the United States.
The proposal by John Koza, who also invented the scratch-off lottery ticket, is receiving serious consideration by lawmakers in several states. Legislators in California, New York, Colorado, Illinois and Missouri have sponsored bills to enact such a plan.
Koza's scheme calls for an interstate compact that would require states to throw all of their electoral votes behind the winner of the national popular vote, regardless of which candidate wins in each state. The plan doesn't require all 50 states to join, but a combination of states that represent a majority (at least 270) of the electoral votes. If the largest states join in the agreement, only 11 would be needed.
Supporters say the proposal would avoid such controversial results as the 2000 presidential election when Republican George W. Bush was declared the winner despite losing the popular vote to Al Gore, a Democrat. There were three other instances in the history of the United States -- 1824, 1876 and 1888 -- when the winner of the popular vote lost in the Electoral College vote.
Proponents say Koza's proposal is ingenious because it would avoid the immensely difficult task of trying to get rid of the Electoral College system by amending the U.S. Constitution.
My two cents - definitely an interesting approach. I termed it a "work-around" as that is essentially what it is (and something that often comes up with computers, where you tweak the code a certain way in order to get something done in a manner that may not be elegant but at least is easy). In any case, I kind of hope it happens, though since it's more likely to be approved by big blue states (e.g. New York, California) that means that if it is approved and if a Republican wins the election (both popular and electoral), they will possibly receive a grossly exaggerated share of the electoral votes (as they'll get the red states they actually won plus the blue states that signed this thing).